The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, if userfication is requested please post at WP:REFUND Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:26, 19 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Matteo Sommacal

Matteo Sommacal (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Renom due to no consensus, and very little participation. Argument remains the same. A whole lot of WP:COATRACKing that adds up to nothing, on an article that was apparently created by the subject. Has no musical releases cited to anything, has nothing academic that would meet that guideline either. Local play only on specific programs does not denote rotation. No reviews, no other material that would lead to a sense of coverage. MSJapan ( talk) 01:46, 11 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:49, 11 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:49, 11 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:49, 11 August 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete. A GS h-index of 8 is off to a good start but, as yet, WP:Too soon for WP:Prof. I am willing to listen to arguments about his music. Xxanthippe ( talk) 02:20, 11 August 2016 (UTC). reply
• Delete non-notable academic. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 17:26, 12 August 2016 (UTC) reply
• Delete or Userfy. His scientific and musical works certainly seem legitimate, and he's probably a great guy – but I don't see evidence (yet) that he satisfies any of the specific criteria for WP:PROF or WP:COMPOSER, and I'm always wary of WP bio articles that consist of an individual recounting his own life and press clippings. It's also a bit odd that he has no article that might establish notability in his native Italian WP. After 5 years of edits and 3 proposals for deletion, this is presumably as good as the article will get, for the foreseeable future. — Patrug ( talk) 10:30, 18 August 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.