The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Disputed speedy (G14). Page disambiguates one article plus a section of another article (referring to match wagons), but there is dispute on the page history over whether the distinction is actually a difference. That should determine whether to delete/redirect; I am taking it here to resolve the speedy dispute and get outside opinions.
ChromaNebula(talk) 21:07, 23 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Redirect The dab lists
match wagon and
idler flatcar which leads to Idler flatcars are also used to mount one kind of coupler on one end and another kind on the other end. This is called a
barrier vehicle or match wagon. The only real target is barrier vehicle,
match wagon should just redirect there.
MB 01:40, 24 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Deletematch wagon (disambiguation), redirectmatch wagon (already done). I had the same thought process as MB above. As written, a "match wagon" is also known as a "barrier vehicle", which is a type of "idler flatcar". So saying that "match wagon" could be either is redundant.
Hoof Hearted (
talk) 12:25, 24 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 21:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 23:40, 7 July 2022 (UTC)reply
delete This seems to be stumbling quite a bit over NA/UK terminology disjunct, as "flatcar" is an NA term and "match wagon" is UK. Also, idler car (NA) isn't a type of car; it's a usage. Dedicated ones, one would imagine, are usually flatcars for various reasons, but they don't have to be: at
Savage Mill they used whatever they had on hand to keep the locos off the ancient bridge, typically just other cars in the consist. It seems likely that an idler might also do coupler conversion, but they are still two different functions and I don't see the validity of this disambiguation. It would make sense to use hat notes in the respective articles instead, if necessary.
Mangoe (
talk) 00:12, 8 July 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.