The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Suggesting that this be deleted outright or redirected to
SUPSI.
Very little substantive, in-depth coverage from reliable, independent sources on search engines/Google News/Google Newspaper Archive/Books about this program. For instance, there are lots of blurbs like
this that demonstrate the program's existence, but they are not particularly substantial in nature. Most discussion of the program comes from SUPSI itself or from a source partnered with it
This and
this do not, in my opinion, constitute significant enough coverage to meet
organizational notability requirements or
the general notability guideline.
My searches revealed no hits on Highbeam or JSTOR. Perhaps there is coverage in German?
/wia🎄
/tlk 00:09, 17 December 2015 (UTC)reply
delete nonnotable part of some curriculum.
Staszek Lem (
talk) 03:12, 17 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.