The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The page refers to only a single item: a rabbit, and the two books that have been written about the rabbit. Since the two books about the rabbit are already widely discussed in
the rabbit's article, this disambiguation is unnecessary.
BarbadosKen (
talk) 00:42, 4 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep No need to delete, it's convenient for many readers who just want to read about the book.
Davey2116 (
talk) 01:34, 4 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Readers looking for the books can find link for them in the
rabbit's article. The (disambiguation) in the parenthesis in the article name is needed if there are more uses for a common use term. Therefore, there is no need for the disambiguation page in question.
BarbadosKen (
talk) 01:44, 4 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. These are partial matches. Ordinarily I get around this by citing the character in the work, but that's for different characters. In this case, it's all the same one.
Clarityfiend (
talk) 09:30, 4 April 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.