The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Only Keep !vote was predicated on article being improved, which has not happened.
Yunshui雲水 11:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)reply
I'm not seeing enough independent coverage to meet
WP:GNG nor claims that clearly meet
WP:NBIO. Searching online, I was able to find some trivial coverage but nothing significant, although the presence of search results about other individuals by this name could have led to me missing something. That having been said, based on what I was able to find, I think that this may be a case of
WP:TOOSOONsigned, Rosguilltalk 20:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - He doesn't appear to be well-known enough to receive the reliable source coverage that we need. I agree. Merely being associated with notable comedic entities doesn't make one notable.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk) 21:36, 16 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 02:31, 24 April 2020 (UTC)reply
In response to the keep vote before the relist, I'm not seeing anything in the first few pages of search results that would help get this article to HEY standards. There's a lot of false positives, and the few results that are actually about this subject looked trivial/routine. signed, Rosguilltalk 02:45, 24 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.