- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Barkeep49 ( talk) 20:40, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Mark Ritson
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mark Ritson ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Academic/marketing BLP, does not pass WP:NBIO. There is no shortage of references, but the events described do not establish notability. 1292simon ( talk) 09:36, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Night fury 13:33, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Night fury 13:33, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Night fury 13:33, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete does not pass our inclusion criteria for academics. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 19:45, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete clearly fails all possibilities of inclusion listed in WP:NACADEMIC and is therefore not a notable academic. Fails to show widespread impact in other fields, including as a columnist. Footlessmouse ( talk) 07:52, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.