The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –
Joe (
talk) 22:50, 6 January 2018 (UTC)reply
originally written as a paid promotional article with very borderline notability ; the subsequent legal involvement does not make her more notable. (I do admit to a certain grim satisfaction to how the promotionalism turned out,but it's still unfair to have the article) DGG (
talk ) 02:38, 16 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:17, 23 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete as per nom. I don't think her legal problems pass
WP:CRIME.--
Rusf10 (
talk) 04:23, 23 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep on balance. I agree it's borderline and the COI notice should remain in place regardless.
Deb (
talk) 08:45, 23 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Strong delete WIkipedia is not a place for self-promotion.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 05:43, 28 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
Joe (
talk) 10:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete -- promo 'cruft on a non notable person.
K.e.coffman (
talk) 01:53, 1 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.