The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ( t · c) buidhe 07:12, 7 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Margo Feiden

Margo Feiden (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable theater owner fails WP:GNG. Proximity to fame does not confer fame, just as proximity to notability does not confer notability. The page also has a strong WP:PROMO feel. KidAd talk 05:00, 30 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 06:09, 30 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 06:09, 30 September 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep the notable gallery owner. Well sourced. Does not read like promo to me. DiamondRemley39 ( talk) 09:48, 30 September 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep clearly meets GNG just on the NYTimes articles I looked at, and there are plenty of other sources. Needs a little cleanup, sure. -- Krelnik ( talk) 12:13, 30 September 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep she lost the Hirschfeld case and a lot of information is here. -- k72ndst ( talk) 14:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC) reply

  K72ndst, the NYT says they corrected earlier reports to say the case was dropped, and the contract renogotiated. ^[1] Anyway, she's a fascinating character with great stories to tell. This could easily become a really good article. Keep

References