From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:56, 12 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Mareroo

Mareroo (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Genames calls it an unverified populated place, and I couldn't verify it either. Coords land on the mouth of a dry riverbed, with one building not too far off, and that's it. GHits are thrown off by someone with a similar name, but when you exclude him, yes, it's all clickbait. Mangoe ( talk) 03:11, 4 April 2018 (UTC) reply

  • Delete: The only source (which is very outdated) shows no population and satellite images show empty desert. NWWT ( talk) 03:53, 4 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 05:11, 4 April 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Somalia-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 05:11, 4 April 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nomination. And keep deleting 'em until those happily creating such feathery material get the message. - The Gnome ( talk) 13:14, 4 April 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Towns passes Wikipedia Pillar 6. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:19, 4 April 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.