The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails
WP:NHOCKEY. While he won awards in Division III of the NCAA, that is not a high enough level, as far as I understand it.
Kaiser matias (
talk) 12:04, 30 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 01:30, 7 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete, he never played in a sufficiently notable league, therefore fails
WP:NHOCKEY. PKT(alk) 11:50, 7 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete After looking this over I have to agree with the nominator. The application of Criterion 4 should only apply to Division I athletes and he never got above Division III.
Deadman137 (
talk) 15:07, 8 April 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.