The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
notable for single minor crime long ago
Jason from nyc (
talk) 14:37, 23 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Delete: Seemingly a clear case of
WP:BLP1E. Alternatively, a merge might be a solution per
WP:CRIMINAL. --
BenTels (
talk) 15:04, 23 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Selective merge to
Blasphemy law#Germany. Agreed that this is a BLP1E, but it is mostly about the application of German blasphemy law. Sandstein 15:53, 23 September 2012 (UTC)reply
Keep but further anonymize the article. the previous conviction should be mentioned, but not the occupational details. Sufficiently a matter of public interest. DGG (
talk ) 00:15, 1 October 2012 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Drmies (
talk) 05:10, 1 October 2012 (UTC)reply
Merge to
Blasphemy law#Germany or could use it as start of a separate article on German blasphemy law. As an article on the individual who is only known for one event it falls under
WP:BLP1E. I wondered if the event might be notable, but a brief internet search (including German sources) suggests not: coverage is from around the time of his conviction with a lack of long-term interest aside from a few brief mentions. Finally, arguing against his notability as an individual, some newspaper stories don't even give his name, e.g.
[1]. German Wikipedia covers it in their article on blasphemy law,
de:Beschimpfung von Bekenntnissen, Religionsgesellschaften und Weltanschauungsvereinigungen, which isn't a deciding factor as different wikis have different policies, but may indicate its lack of notability. --
Colapeninsula (
talk) 10:34, 1 October 2012 (UTC)reply
Merge to
Blasphemy law#Germany per WP:BLP1E, due to lack of persistent coverage. The person and his actions were a flash in the pan.
Gun Powder Ma (
talk) 16:14, 3 October 2012 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.