From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America 1000 03:08, 14 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Mandaue Foam Industries

Mandaue Foam Industries (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable; everything here is essentially advertising & press releases. DGG ( talk ) 04:43, 22 May 2015 (UTC) reply

  • Delete as there is not that much significant and notable coverage, News, listings at Books, a few results at highbeam and nothing at thefreelibrary. They have received a little attention and the article is neat and sourced but enough. SwisterTwister talk 05:57, 22 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:43, 24 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:43, 24 May 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. Plenty of independent reliable sources for Mandaue Foam, a famous local brand of home furniture and home decor in the Philippines.-- RioHondo ( talk) 01:52, 24 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC) reply
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
  • Keep as having multiple in depth independent coverage. VMS Mosaic ( talk) 02:00, 30 May 2015 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 02:17, 6 June 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.