- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. User:Oaktree b may well be right, but this AfD did not come about in the proper way, to put it mildly, and we don't need AfDs clouded by suspicions of paid editing and misrepresentation. Drmies ( talk) 20:25, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Manav Bhinder ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The filmmaker, Manav Bhinder, was initially unaware of his Wikipedia page. The page was recently vandalized and subsequently protected for a few days. However, Mr. Bhinder has since expressed a clear desire for privacy and has requested that the page be removed to respect his wishes.
Manav Bhinder has reviewed the article on " Wikipedia:FAQ/Article subjects" suggested by one of the user and is now convinced that Wikipedia can handle vandalism. Therefore, he no longer wishes to proceed with the deletion and would like to withdraw the nomination for this page.
Pradeepsethi.in ( talk) 21:29, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please ask Mr. Bhinder to read
Wikipedia:FAQ/Article subjects and take action (or decline to take action) accordingly.
Gottagotospace (
talk) 21:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Manav Bhinder has reviewed the recommended article on "
Wikipedia:FAQ/Article subjects", and is now convinced that Wikipedia can handle vandalism. Therefore, he no longer wishes to proceed with the deletion of the article.
Pradeepsethi.in (
talk) 19:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- @ Pradeepsethi.in We have no idea whi you are, nir any evidence of any delegated authority by Bhinder. For all we know you are unconnected and making mischief. Bhinder should approach WP:VRT himself, directly, and make his personal case there. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:46, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Manav Bhinder has reviewed the recommended article on "
Wikipedia:FAQ/Article subjects", and is now convinced that Wikipedia can handle vandalism. Therefore, he no longer wishes to proceed with the deletion of the article.
Pradeepsethi.in (
talk) 19:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Setting aside any notability in the article and focussing solely on the deletion rationale, I see nothing to suggest that Wikipedia accede to the nominator's request. Manav Bhinder must make his own case correctly according to the advice given above. There is absolutely no proof that the nominator is acting on Bhinder's behalf. 🇺🇦
FiddleTimtrent
FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 22:30, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- What kind of proof or evidence do I need to provide to demonstrate that I am acting on Bhinder's behalf? He is not comfortable editing wikipedia pages to raise a request, which is why he asked me to represent him. Pradeepsethi.in ( talk) 06:39, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Regardless of the request above, I don't find sourcing about this individual that would meet GNG. Article is sourced to imdb and stories about other people where this person is mentioned. I don't find coverage we'd use to build an article. Oaktree b ( talk) 00:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.