The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:30, 13 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Mahmood Khan

Mahmood Khan (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Autobiography sourced by his own press releases & website. Cabayi ( talk) 14:47, 6 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Ping previous contributors A Great Catholic Person, Bearcat, Bgwhite, DoctorKubla, Editfromwithout, Jevansen, Jihadcola, Magioladitis, Mar4d, Ohconfucius, Oshwah, Rjwilmsi, Rrburke, Ruff tuff cream puff, Tassedethe, Voceditenore, WOSlinker -- Cabayi ( talk) 15:06, 6 April 2018 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Wikipedia is not a free public relations platform for advertorial self-promotion, but an encyclopedia. Our content needs to be referenced to reliable source coverage in media, not to the subject's own press releases — and apart from an unverified claim that he topped "the mainstream Australian music charts", which also fails to specify which chart provider is involved and thus could be iTunes for all we know, the only other notability claim here is "got X views on a piece of social media content", which is not a valid notability claim in its own right. (And for the record, my only past involvement here was moving the article from an inappropriate category to a more correct one in a batch of categorization cleanup.) There are no references here that constitute reliable sourcing for a Wikipedia article, and the article doesn't state anything about him that's "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have reliable sourcing — and even if a new version can be recreated in the future that makes a better claim of notability and cites better sources for it, he still doesn't get to create the article himself per WP:AUTOBIO and WP:COI. Bearcat ( talk) 15:31, 6 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MT Train ^Talk 15:55, 6 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MT Train ^Talk 15:55, 6 April 2018 (UTC) reply

• Comment The chart referred to is the ARIA physical singles chart which MKF did top. MKF also made the top 50 in the singles chart. See ARIA report 1024 for the peak and 1022 for the entry (links are to pdfs). duffbeerforme ( talk) 01:33, 7 April 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete this dishonest boastful advetorial and let someone else start over. duffbeerforme ( talk) 02:00, 7 April 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete per WP:VSCA. This spam was apparently created by the subject himself with few or little credible independent sources, and it's relly a wonder how this has survived on WP for so many years before being spotted for what it truly is. --  Ohc  ^¡digame! 09:26, 7 April 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete per above arguments.  samee   converse  20:25, 10 April 2018 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom nom nom.  M A A Z   T A L K  21:30, 10 April 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.