From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Greyhawk characters#Lum the Mad. ( non-admin closure) Sam Sailor 01:36, 7 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Machine of Lum the Mad

Machine of Lum the Mad (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails to establish notability. TTN ( talk) 01:09, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN ( talk) 01:09, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 01:13, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep or merge to Magic item (Dungeons & Dragons). BOZ ( talk) 01:56, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Merge into List of Greyhawk characters#Lum the Mad. I created the original redirect, but not the actual content of the article. I took a look at "find sources" above, but I still don't see enough secondary sources to truly establish notability. While I feel it is important, I can't really back that up via the standard Wikipedia process. My impression is that this article belongs on a different kind of wiki, perhaps one that uses an "in universe" perspective. That said, I think converting this article back to a redirect would be better than utter deletion. BOZ has offered his suggestion and I have offered mine. Either redirect would be acceptable as far as I am concerned. GentlemanGhost (converse) 02:13, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 13:35, 31 August 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.