The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Bobherry Talk Edits 13:16, 16 April 2018 (UTC) reply

M.A.V. (Modular Assault Vehicle)

M.A.V. (Modular Assault Vehicle) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON for an article - game is still in development and non-notable currently. _{ZXCVBNM ( TALK)} 04:24, 9 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 04:52, 9 April 2018 (UTC) reply

• Keep - Not sure I agree with that assessment. There is quite a bit of coverage (I didn't think there would be either), from Engadget.com, Gert Lush Gaming, N4G, PC GamesN, vice, and also the RPS link that is referenced in the article. Lee Vilenski ^{( talk • contribs)} 08:25, 9 April 2018 (UTC) reply
  • I saw those too, but they are only previews. It doesn't seem like significant or sustained coverage that would confer notability. _{ZXCVBNM ( TALK)} 18:49, 9 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Lee Vilenski ^{( talk • contribs)} 08:28, 9 April 2018 (UTC) reply

I am not quite sure I am doing this correctly. I had just stubbed out the page, as I am very new to this all.

The game is released, in an early access stage. It also was recently named as a finalist in the indieDB top 100 games for 2017 ^[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rogerroger3782 ( talk • contribs) 05:36, 10 April 2018 (UTC) reply

• Keep - As others have shown, there's plenty of RS coverage for this game. Phediuk ( talk) 15:00, 15 April 2018 (UTC) reply
• Keep, there is enough coverage on google and in this afd to satisfy gng. Szzuk ( talk) 09:23, 16 April 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.