The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. These are
soft deletes, due to the low rate of participation despite three relists.
Lankiveil(
speak to me) 09:51, 9 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Note that three articles are nominated for deletion herein.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:11, 16 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Note that three articles are nominated for deletion herein.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:19, 23 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist - hopefully people will participate.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Exemplo347 (
talk) 11:36, 1 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete all the nominated articles and close this Afd. While there is evidence I have found of the existence of these offices, none of these establishments have evidence of any independent claim to notability. The content too is not worth merging.
Lourdes 06:46, 9 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.