The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Wizardman 16:08, 19 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Not-notable, coverage seems routine.
Alex (
talk) 21:50, 13 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete 17 sources seems impressive on the surface, but these are
WP:ROUTINE mentions that don't go in depth as required by
WP:GNG. This isn't significant coverage. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 15:25, 14 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete per others.--
Yankees10 17:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.