The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This disambiguation page appears to have been created purely based on the fact that "Lucilia nitens" was originally listed at both
Lucilia (fly) and
Lucilia (plant). However, on closer inspection, it turns out that the former article had erroneously listed a number of plant species, one of which was "Lucilia nitens Less.". Thus the basis for this disambiguation page completely disintegrates. (This is apart from the fact that nobody had ever tried to create either species articles, so it's no wonder this error went by unnoticed)
Monster Iestyn (
talk) 12:22, 1 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete, this could be G14'ed as a dab page that does not disambiguate any article - both entries are redlinks without meeting
WP:DABRED.
MB 21:47, 1 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment: I had considered speedy delete under G14, but wasn't sure if "Regardless of title, disambiguation pages that disambiguate zero extant Wikipedia pages" (from
WP:G14) covered a disambiguation page consisting entirely of redlinks or not.
Monster Iestyn (
talk) 13:02, 2 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.