The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
unimportant web product sourced to self-published sources and press release reprints.
SchmuckyTheCat (
talk) 17:11, 16 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Comment: Like a user left on your talk page, what is "self-published sources" and who are you to deem something "unimportant". This seems like an irresponsible AfD to me. You initially added a PROD (deleting such pages after 7 days if no objections are raised), then waited 2 days, then added an AfD.
MessagefromXENUcomplaints? leave me a message! 19:01, 19 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Strong Keep: It's a member of the Dojo Foundation, was featured in ComputerWorld, Ajaxian and is mentioned in a few other online articles. If needed, I'll add further citations (there's more on the Internet if you bother looking).
MessagefromXENUcomplaints? leave me a message! 18:46, 19 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep: There's no real benefit to deleting it, plus it seems notable enough, as Xenu mentioned.
71.190.222.220 (
talk) 21:01, 19 November 2009 (UTC)reply
only edit from this IP
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton |
Talk 01:13, 24 November 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.