The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I do not think there are any merit in this article to make it ever worth keeping as everything there is
WP:OR, also it is missing
WP:V and lacking
WP:CITE, making this article not worth existing. A topic that fails
WP:GNG.
Donnie Park (
talk) 21:02, 19 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete as WP:TNT at best as there is some coverage about this but certainly not for better improvement. Notifying tagger
Typ932.
SwisterTwistertalk 07:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:28, 26 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Redirect or Keep (Note: The membership section bears a striking resemblance to
Hells Angels#Membership.) I'd favor a redirect to
Motorcycle Club, as the two are essentially the same with the only difference being one involves motorcycles, the other cars. Of course, it could be argued that that difference is substantive in itself, in which case I would argue in favor of a keep with the provision that some sources can be found, because if we have an article on motorcycle clubs, then I'm sure something can be dug up on lowrider clubs. DiscantX 11:09, 26 November 2015 (UTC)reply
After looking at potential sources I'm now convinced there's enough reference material to keep the article, though some rewriting may be in order. No reason to nuke the whole article, it just needs some work. DiscantX 03:38, 4 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Whilst I understand where you're getting at, the big issue with this is that nothing of these are sourced, so unless something is done, I will have stand by my decision to delete.
Donnie Park (
talk) 01:07, 27 November 2015 (UTC)reply
There are a number of promising sources at
the google book search results. I don't have time to do a thorough search right now, and I can't guarantee that everything in the article will be able to be substantiated, but I feel like there's probably enough info out there to merit an article here, even if it means
blowing the whole thing up. I'd like to give it a go but I may not have time over the weekend. DiscantX 02:52, 27 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:47, 3 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: To give
DiscantX more time to edit the article.
Onel5969TT me 20:42, 11 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Thanks, I'm working on it slowly. I might be able to get more done Sunday. DiscantX 06:17, 12 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Onel5969TT me 20:42, 11 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.