The result was merge to Lower Salmon Falls Dam. Liz Read! Talk! 20:52, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
No assertion of notability, during my BEFORE I didn't find any notability indicated in reliable sources. It appears most references to it are in environmental studies and tourism sites. Even appears to fail WP:GEOLAND. FrederalBacon ( talk) 20:55, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
The number of known sources should be considered to ensure there is enough verifiable content for an encyclopedic article. If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography.Merge is not an AfD outcome and should be proposed seperately, although if a closing admin chose to do a bold merge, that would be acceptable - there is not much mergeable content here. The question for AfD is whether there is enough here to establish notability for an encyclopaedic article. The answer to that is no. An acceptable alternative outcome in this case would be Redirect to Lower Salmon Falls Dam which would also preserve the edit history should anyone wish to use the page history to add information to the other article. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 20:20, 24 August 2022 (UTC)