From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Lower Salmon Falls Dam. Liz Read! Talk! 20:52, 30 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Lower Salmon Falls

Lower Salmon Falls (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assertion of notability, during my BEFORE I didn't find any notability indicated in reliable sources. It appears most references to it are in environmental studies and tourism sites. Even appears to fail WP:GEOLAND. FrederalBacon ( talk) 20:55, 23 August 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. FrederalBacon ( talk) 20:55, 23 August 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Merge to Lower Salmon Falls Dam. Djflem ( talk) 21:04, 23 August 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per WP:GEOLAND, which says The number of known sources should be considered to ensure there is enough verifiable content for an encyclopedic article. If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography. Merge is not an AfD outcome and should be proposed seperately, although if a closing admin chose to do a bold merge, that would be acceptable - there is not much mergeable content here. The question for AfD is whether there is enough here to establish notability for an encyclopaedic article. The answer to that is no. An acceptable alternative outcome in this case would be Redirect to Lower Salmon Falls Dam which would also preserve the edit history should anyone wish to use the page history to add information to the other article. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 20:20, 24 August 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.