The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:47, 26 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Lottoland

Lottoland (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is essential an advertorial defending the legality of the operation DGG ( talk ) 04:55, 19 July 2017 (UTC) reply

This is a completely false assertion. The article describes an object perceived in many countries of the world. The sources are valid. It belongs to the subject that in Germany, state Lotto companies claim that the activities of Lottoland in Germany are a violation of the German Inter-State Gambling Treaty. This controversy is clearly adressed. Both views are described on the basis of valid sources. Above that: There is not a single court in Germany that prohibits Lottoland’s business. Atomiccocktail ( talk) 07:34, 19 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Keep - Pretty big company, well known to may, sourced article. Fleets ( talk) 08:17, 19 July 2017 (UTC) reply

• Keep It's a bit on the promotional side, and first-party sources should be replaced where possible, and more criticism and third-party analysis added (I started a criticism section). But it's notable with coverage in respected newspapers internationally e.g. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. -- Colapeninsula ( talk) 09:04, 19 July 2017 (UTC) reply
• Keep. No valid reason given. If DGG wants to make a point on paid editing, this is definitely not the right place. -- 90.186.3.196 ( talk) 11:57, 19 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 12:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 12:22, 19 July 2017 (UTC) reply

• Keep. Company in question has notability beyond the nom's point about gambling operations. Sources meet WP:VER.-- SamHolt6 ( talk) 18:41, 19 July 2017 (UTC) reply
• Speedy delete G5 - Original was speedied A7/G11, the second as a G5. Paying someone to bring the article in from :de: to evade the block is meatpuppetry pure and simple. Atomiccocktail's involvement in the AfD of an article he created as Einfach machen Hamburg is plain sockpuppetry. Cabayi ( talk) 19:37, 26 July 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.