The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete Clearly not notable and way to local to appeal to the broad audience that Wikipedia is suppose to anyway. --
Adamant1 (
talk) 11:08, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Fails
WP:GNG based on the absence of independent sourcing about the subject. —C.Fred (
talk) 14:15, 4 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nominator.
...William, is the complaint department really on
the roof? 10:29, 9 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:RS and
WP:V. By lacking reliable sources, nothing claimed can be verified. Churches are not automatically notable. It also fails for want of even a single factor of
my standards for notable historic churches.
Bearian (
talk) 00:51, 10 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.