The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. No consensus to delete. Malinaccier (
talk) 00:09, 23 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep - I added two UK porn awards to the article. That's enough to satisfy
WP:PORNBIO for me.
Morbidthoughts (
talk) 00:23, 18 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Weak Keep by virtue of awards. Also is nom sure this is first time at AfD? I could have sworn she'd been kept previously.
Horrorshowj (
talk) 06:46, 18 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Keep because of the awards. -
Mgm|
(talk) 09:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete. There's no reliable, reputable sources being cited by this article indicating this person's importance, only blogs and commercial sites of questionable repute. krimpet✽ 06:05, 19 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete No evidence that the award she won is a notable award. I won the MVP of the 5th grade intramural flag football league in middle school. My parents have the trophy to prove it. Doesn't mean that I get a Wikipedia article... --
Jayron32.
talk.
contribs 04:11, 22 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Microscopically weak keep per the award but note that the article on the award noted above was created the same day as this nomination but one half hour before it. --
Ron Ritzman (
talk) 14:11, 22 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete. It's really detailed, yet there seems to be no point to it.
TopGearFreakTalk 16:09, 22 November 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.