The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. czar 22:26, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Article about a television film, not reliably sourced as having any notability claim that would pass WP:NFILM. As always, films are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they have IMDb entries -- to be notable enough for Wikipedia, a film has to have demonstrable significance, such as noteworthy awards and/or published reviews from notable film critics. But the only footnotes here, before I stripped them as improperly formatted primary sources, were to IMDb and another IMDb-like directory, not to any evidence of reliable source coverage about the film, and even on a search for reliable sources to salvage it with, I can only find one review in a GNG-worthy publication, which is not enough. Bearcat ( talk) 01:39, 5 April 2020 (UTC)