The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep: Rather than delete it, I'd prefer it if we could stir up some interest from the guys who ran it, maybe get them to write an article, update the page with the facts and link to them. I'll ask over at merseypirates Bitplane 10:12, 30 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Bitplane (
talk •
contribs)
Comment - Even if this were done, it would fail
WP:SOURCES and
WP:SPS guidelines, and be eligible for deletion.
Rapido (
talk) 10:28, 30 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Comment - I don't think it would be acceptable to "stir up some interest" and create an article just for an excuse to use it as a reference to justify a Wikipedia entry. Remember, there are
alternative outlets.
Rapido (
talk) 11:16, 30 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Timotheus Canens (
talk) 02:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete not even the barest claim to notability in the article, and besides that it was deleted via AfD just months ago (see previous debate).
Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.