The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 17:39, 2 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Obvious attempt at advertising.
⇒Pickbothmanlol 17:24, 25 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete. I don't think the article is advertising, but I can't find evidence that the magazine is notable. –
Eastmain (
talk) 02:58, 26 November 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Status as "advertising agency" leads me to wonder if this is genuine magazine anyway. --
JohnnyB256 (
talk) 21:45, 26 November 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.