- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 00:48, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Litmus (Mozilla)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Litmus (Mozilla) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article does not cover a notable topic.
Litmus appears to have been mainly a tool for internal use at Mozilla; it was strictly speaking available for others to use but never seems to have become popular. It was abandoned some time ago, and doesn't appear to be of particular historical interest. There are no third-party references in the article, and a brief search didn't find anything that would be useful as a third-party reference. Kiwi128 ( talk) 00:01, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 08:00, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Approximately nobody outside of Mozilla appears to have ever used or mentioned this. 3mi1y ( talk) 08:54, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG as no independent and reliable sources have been found. 0x Deadbeef→∞ ( talk to me) 10:32, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and 0xDeadbeef. No significance can be seen and sources are not reliable enough to verify content. Timothytyy ( talk) 14:22, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.