The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 17:03, 16 December 2014 (UTC)reply
This article should not be deleted as it lists all trains originating at this train station. Having this huge list as a part of the main article (
Lokmanya Tilak Terminus) would make it very long. This list is essential to keep a tab on all articles related to this train station. -
Abhijit Sathe (
talk) 11:46, 9 December 2014 (UTC)reply
How is this list different than
Air India destinations? It shows which cities and airports Air India flights serve. If you want to have frequency and departure timing columns removed from
List of trains at Lokmanya Tilak Terminus, that would be acceptable. But I strongly challenge your deletion notice. -
Abhijit Sathe (
talk) 05:37, 10 December 2014 (UTC)reply
As far as I'm aware destinations for airports are deemed notable and plus they're of national interest whereas train destinations aren't so much,
Train carriage no, frequency and departure are generally pointless - Take all that away and you have pretty much nothing other than train companies name and the destination,
If you wanna merge bits in then thats fine(ish!) but as it stands now the article serves no purpose to the peia other than act as a timetable. (BTW I've moved your comment up so if you were pinged by me then that's why) –
Davey2010 •
(talk) 05:52, 10 December 2014 (UTC)reply
If one starts creating such lists for all railway stations, then I agree it does not serve purpose. However, the train stations in question are among the busiest in the country. What this list accomplishes at the very minimum is keeping a record of all train-related articles relevant to this station in one place. If you want to merge this list with the station article, that would be okay except that it will make the station article extremely long. -
Abhijit Sathe (
talk) 06:09, 10 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete—as the others have noted, this isn't appropriate to our encyclopedia. 11:06, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
I have included this list on the station page and removed columns that make it look like a timetable. I have no issues with this article deletion anymore. -
Abhijit Sathe (
talk) 05:38, 15 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.