The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
✗plicit 03:36, 24 November 2021 (UTC)reply
List of presidents/prime ministers by longevity (batch nomination)
Trivial cross-categorisations ("age at death" and "former political office holder") which are also
statistical trivia and which typically fail to cite a single source, thus not meeting either of
WP:V or
WP:LISTN, and violating
WP:OR. Just a massive collection of
WP:TRIVIA (
one article has a Presidents by age group (Septuagenarian, Quinquagenarian, Quadragenarian etc.) table and chart...) only some of which is: ages and lengths of time repeatedly given in years and days; many further calculate how many xx,xxx thousands of days someone was/is alive or retired; some have a section for the apparently Wikipedia editor created title "oldest living leader of x" over time. The relevant parent lists are of a vastly higher quality and are all Wikipedia needs.
Comment The
List of prime ministers of the Netherlands by age page has a table that displays the PM by time in office. Not sure why exactly its in this article but I think this table in particular should be kept somewhere in line with recent precedents.
Superegz (
talk) 21:04, 11 November 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Superegz The article
List of prime ministers of the Netherlands already has that sortable column, it's just only in days, not years and days like here. Nothing will be lost if this article is deleted, and the other article can be easily altered to display time in office in years and days format if that is what you prefer. I hope that satisfies your concern.
Newshunter12 (
talk) 04:06, 12 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete content forks of their respective "List of presidents/prime ministers of X" pages. Unnecessary listcruft.
Vladimir.copic (
talk) 04:28, 12 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep The sourcing issue is easily resolved because a head of state/government's birthdates, death dates, and terms of office are easily sourced. The discussion of a head of state/government's age is frequently discussed in the press. I turn to the arguments in
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of prime ministers of the United Kingdom by age, particularly those by SSSB.
OCNative (
talk) 20:00, 12 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete, per precedent in several recent discussions. Longevity and career is a non-encyclopedic cross-categorization. Also
WP:NOTSTATS.
pburka (
talk) 21:03, 12 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 00:13, 18 November 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete Any group of people can theoretically be listed by any number of parameters. However, most of those combinations of groups and parameters constitute
WP:Non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations. In order for such a list to make for a valid stand-alone article, there needs to be a good reason why that particular group should be listed by that particular parameter. Otherwise,
WP:DELREASON#14 (Any other content
not suitable for an encyclopedia) applies. In this case, it has not been demonstrated that there is a good reason to list these groups by this parameter.
TompaDompa (
talk) 17:28, 20 November 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.