The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Geschichte (
talk) 08:08, 16 November 2020 (UTC)reply
This list is completely unsourced or cited to primary sources, and cannot meet the
WP:GNG. Combining random non-notable minor characters into a singular list gives you a non-notable list. Whichever characters do meet the
WP:GNG are already listed under the
List of Peanuts characters article, and this
WP:CONTENTFORK does not meet our encyclopedic standards.
Jontesta (
talk) 19:45, 8 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete as creator. The few characters that are worth mentioning can be mentioned within the main character list or the main article. Ten Pound Hammer • (
What did I screw up now?) 19:47, 8 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete If a list says "minor characters", it probably isn't notable in modern-day Wikipedia. This article is no exception and fails GNG.ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 20:38, 8 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment - I don't really have a vote, but I would like to point out that "Minor character = Not notable" is a fallacy. There are a lot of minor characters that meet GNG, and there are a lot of major characters with little to no coverage. Be mindful of this when nominating "List of minor [X] characters" lists. Darkknight2149 03:48, 9 November 2020 (UTC)reply
This is why I gave the caveat that some can be combined to the main page. For instance, Charlotte Braun only had a couple appearances but she has been widely documented. Ten Pound Hammer • (
What did I screw up now?) 16:32, 10 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - None of the characters listed here are individually notable, with the exception of a couple that are already covered elsewhere (The Great Pumpkin, the Little Red-Haired Girl). There are no real sources that I can find that cover this grouping of minor and background characters, either, so it fails
WP:LISTN. As none of the information here appears to be reliably sourced (its either primary sources or non-reliable sources like blogs), there is nothing that should be merged.
Rorshacma (
talk) 16:34, 9 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.