The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Strikes me as hard to maintain and not that informative for the reader. Does someone like
Lord Carrington really belong in the same list as veterans of the Iraq War, for example?
Ivar the Boneful (
talk) 16:12, 2 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment In American politics, there's enough coverage of "veterans running for office" that a page like this would be notable. I don't know if British politics has similar coverage. I feel that a category would be easier to maintain in this case, but AfD isn't a good place for List v. Category debates.
power~enwiki (
π,
ν) 20:13, 8 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The BushrangerOne ping only 00:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep: no policy reason to delete.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 18:10, 13 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment. "Does someone like
Lord Carrington really belong in the same list as veterans of the Iraq War, for example?" I'm a bit puzzled by this question. What do you mean? They're all military/combat veterans. Is it the mixing of wars you don't like or do you think one is more worthy than the other? --
Necrothesp (
talk) 15:48, 15 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(
c ) (
m) 03:33, 16 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep It is neither hard to maintain nor uninformative. I can't see any other reason put forward for deletion. --
Pontificalibus (
talk) 12:10, 16 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep It's a useful list with defined criteria which will never become unduly long or hard to maintain. Can't see how it violates policy.
Neiltonks (
talk) 13:01, 16 November 2017 (UTC)reply
leaning delete The only way this is being kept manageable is by limiting it to current politicians, which then turns it into a maintenance project. In other words, it's being kept from being indiscriminate by drawing an arbitrary line. A more general article discussing the relationship of military service to British politics would actually be useful.
Mangoe (
talk) 18:41, 16 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete as an unnecessary cross-categorisation, failing
WP:NOT.
K.e.coffman (
talk) 21:23, 19 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete, arbitrary listing criterium,
WP:IINFO. Also, I understand that prior to modern times most British politicians had some sort of military background. Sandstein 12:02, 24 November 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.