The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails
WP:NLIST. After removing the firms that didn't belong, we are left with only three firms, hardly enough for a category or a list. And one of the firms, DLA Piper, does not have an office in Uganda. It uses another firm for Ugandan issues (what Piper calls a relational office). Although it doesn't strictly relate to notability, the article was created by a sock who, along with other socks, created a bunch of articles of Ugandan law firms.
Bbb23 (
talk) 01:42, 22 May 2014 (UTC)reply
I ran a search of GBooks and found this:
[1].
James500 (
talk) 15:30, 23 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar
♔ 17:08, 29 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, postdlf (talk) 15:54, 5 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - a list of three or four firms is useless and falls afoul of
WP:LIST. James's search shows that no sources exist.
Bearian (
talk) 18:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Deleteper nom, and above. There are no other "List of law firms in Foo" articles, and Uganda does not seem to qualify for a "List of largest Foo law firms" article. --
Bejnar (
talk) 00:30, 14 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.