Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_international_goals_scored_by_Sergio_Agüero References

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, the nominator has withdrawn their nomination and there are no other arguments for deletion. Let's not waste our time any more please. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:45, 13 January 2016 (UTC) reply

List of international goals scored by Sergio Agüero

"Withdrawn by nominator" - Notable list of goals. Anyone having doubt should refer to this — Swastik Chakraborty (User talk) 20:54, 13 January 2016 (UTC) reply

I am also nominating the following related pages because of the same reason, not notable for it's own article:

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.

Close this ASAP each list should have its prominence determined independently of one another. For instance, Rooney's international goals saw multiple reliable sources reporting on it (and his international goals list) as he approached the record. We also have a WP:FOOTBALL understanding that top scorers for their country justifies such a list. Please slow down a little and make reasonable and coherent arguments to delete these one at a time. After all, they are all different in significance. P.S. Wambach, for instance, is the highest-scoring international female footballer in history. You want to lump her goals article here? Seriously? The Rambling Man ( talk) 20:58, 13 January 2016 (UTC) reply
- This is a very WP:POINTY nomination. Whenever something that SWASTIK 25 likes is nominated, and looks like it might be deleted, they lash out by nominating other, similar, articles in AfDs of their own, which always seem to more or less directly argue against their own !vote in the first place. Maybe they should read Wikipedia:Don't throw your toys out of the pram. Harrias ^talk 21:03, 13 January 2016 (UTC) reply
  - Agree with Harrias here. To quote SWASTIK 25 (the nominator here) on the nomination he referenced: "Keep: Obviously, a notable article. What else do you mean by notable list of goals, User:Qed237? He is the all-time top goalscorer of Sweden and you are saying this article is not notable? [...] I think a country's top goalscorer should have an article like that, nothing else."
- To add to The Rambling Man's point about Wambach the article is well written and extremely well referenced. -- SuperJew ( talk) 21:08, 13 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Keep: Agree with The Rambling Man - these aren't a group which can be nominated together as they are independent of each other. For example, Tim Cahill is Australia's top scorer of all time, with and exceptionally long-lived international career, as well as a very successful (and reported on in Australia and worldwide) club career. He is also an inspiration and a role model for Aussie kids on the field and off it. -- SuperJew ( talk) 21:00, 13 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Also, you're reasoning for deletion of 36 articles consists of 5 words and a post-added referral to another nomination. -- SuperJew ( talk) 21:03, 13 January 2016 (UTC) reply

Procedural close – this list contains a variety of levels of article: Charlton and Rooney (at least) are FLs, Wambach is the highest-scoring international female footballer in history, while Schürrle has only 20 international goals, and a short parent article. Some of these probably should be merged into the parent article, but they can not be considered in this current large grouping. There simply isn't enough similarity in the cases. Harrias ^talk 21:15, 13 January 2016 (UTC) reply
Keep - I suggest closing this as well as the others, warning the nominator about WP:POINT. People are wasting their time here over a dispute and we should not be part of it. -- CNMall41 ( talk) 21:57, 13 January 2016 (UTC) reply
Keep Per The Rambling Man. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 22:12, 13 January 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.