This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2011 October 19. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. The "keep" !voters have failed to address the issue that this list is inherently WP:OR. There is no objective criteria based on reliable sources that defines which publications are "important" and which are not. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:00, 30 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Inherently POV and original research. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:34, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
-- Bduke (Discussion) 01:59, 24 September 2011 (UTC) reply