The result was no consensus. Valid arguments are made that this list likely to be permanently incomplete and borders on being indiscriminate. However, there is a counter-argument made that the list is still useful even if incomplete, and that its potential for indiscriminate inclusion can be fixed with regular editing, not wholesale deletion. The balance between the problems of excessive lists, and the potential usefulness of this list nonetheless, leads to no consensus either way - hence, a default to keep. ~ mazca talk 00:08, 31 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete. Where to start really? Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information and this list will never be complete - there are millions of films and this will simply get too big and excessive if development continues. The future is also subjective; if a film is released on December 1st and is set on December 25th of the same year, does that mean that it is set in the future? Basically, this is pure listcruft and one of those articles that is so wrong that it's hard to establish a decent nomination. DJ 23:09, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete per DJ. We don't need a list for everything. If we have a list for films set in the future, will we also need a list of films set in the past? This list does not add to Wikipedia. ♥ichi 23:13, 23 August 2009 (UTC) reply
81.110.104.91 ( talk) 04:45, 24 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Delete as per DJ's comments. -- LineofWisdom ( talk) 09:52, 26 August 2009 (UTC) reply