The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 07:22, 22 March 2020 (UTC)reply
I don't agree that "out of date" is a valid reason for deletion. Another way of saying that is "historical information" and historical information is exactly what should be in an encyclopaedia. Note that the rationale for deleting the 1998 article was not that we should not have this information, but that the article data was wildly wrong due to the faulty way the page had been created. However, I don't think it is helpful to have an individual article on each year's UN report. Far more encyclopaedic would be trending information over the years. The
Human Development Index already contains summaries of each report going back to 2013 and that is probably what should happen here.
SpinningSpark 17:42, 7 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
TonyBallioni (
talk) 04:51, 15 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete No need to create separate page for every year.
Mohanabhil (
talk) 07:58, 17 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.