The result was keep. -- Cirt ( talk) 03:14, 7 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Lacking in notability. Most entries have no reliable sources or no sources at all confirming the company is actually a conglomerate. Toshio Yamaguchi ( talk) 22:22, 12 April 2011 (UTC) reply
But the mere fact that a corporation may become, and then cease to be, a conglomerate isn't in and of itself a problem because we don't limit information to what is true at present. If Company X enters the steel industry, but then leaves it ten years later, we would still include Company X on a List of steel producers and then we could annotate the period for which that was the case. Why not the same for conglomerate status, noting when the corporation entered and then exited the unrelated industry? postdlf ( talk) 21:19, 13 April 2011 (UTC) reply