The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep per
WP:SK#1. A valid rationale for deletion is not present. See
WP:DEL-REASON for examples of valid rationales. North America1000 02:31, 16 April 2018 (UTC)reply
The article only cites one blog on
Weebly, which — of course — is unreliable. Regards,
SshibumXZ (
Talk) (
Contributions). 09:03, 9 April 2018 (UTC)reply
I don't see a deletion argument; what sources an article currently cites is irrelevant here. Please read, and then follow,
WP:BEFORE, and then expand your nomination rationale. postdlf (talk) 22:24, 9 April 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.