The result was keep. Please carry on improving the article. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 02:16, 30 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Article is unreferenced and there is no identification that these "art cars" are "well known". There is no clear way to determine what goes or does not go into the list. The lead does not identify the criteria for determination. Most affirmations of notability include fark.com and slashdot, which are not reliable sources. There is nothing in this article that could not be better dealt with at the main article of Art Car. Logical Premise Ergo? 15:46, 22 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Actually the article creator did give these thoughts on the talk page: "Most of the cars in the original list were featured at Petersen's Automotive Museum. Inclusion criteria should in my opinion be fairly high: been on exhibit in a notable gallery, show or museum, are well-known like Batman and Wienermobile, are by famous artists or designers... not someone who has hot rod flames on their GTO or the like but seriously notable vehicles." So there is some attempt at rigorous inclusion criteria. The sourcing is terrible, but could be improved, so that's not an argument for deletion. Fences and windows ( talk) 21:58, 22 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Keep if the articles is improved and some sources added
GainLine
♠
♥ 09:50, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
reply