The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 22:26, 7 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Additionally, SYNTH has not been made in this article. There are absolutely no interpretations at all based on the existing statistics. This is simply a list compiled from existing Wikipedia articles in order to make comparing easier. —
Stevey7788 (
talk) 02:23, 27 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:18, 2 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete both. You can't go around comparing fertility rates from different years and different types of administrative subdivisions. That counts as OR. (And what's with the percentage Malay column?)
Clarityfiend (
talk) 09:22, 2 January 2017 (UTC)reply
delete both each fails GNG as an article topic. This must have arisen out of some argument in a bar somewhere.
Jytdog (
talk) 17:38, 4 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete both - no evidence of being able to meet
WP:LISTNSpiderone 21:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.