The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This list article contains no references and thus does not meet the requirement of
WP:LISTVERIFY. A look at some of the individual articles listed shows that not all of the subjects are identified as critics in the text of their respective articles. Critics are organised on Wikipedia by category, we already have a category for Urdu critics and that seems sufficient.
Mccapra (
talk) 03:51, 15 July 2020 (UTC)reply
If it's verifiable whether someone belongs in
Category:Urdu critics, then it's also verifiable whether they belong in a list of the same thing. If there are incorrect entries in this list, remove them. If there are correct entries that do not have inline sources in this list, add the sources. Keep per
WP:LISTPURP as standard index of people by occupation and as a complement to the category per
WP:CLN. postdlf (talk) 16:54, 15 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep I agree with postdlf argument above that this list should be kept as a complement and in addition to the category. I will work on it to move some references from the existing individual Urdu literary critic articles to this List article. Encourage others to join in as well and work on it. There are dozens of Urdu critics on the list and we certainly have references there to copy-paste them here.
Ngrewal1 (
talk) 18:19, 15 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Added 6 references to the above 'List article' today.
Ngrewal1 (
talk) 00:02, 17 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep as discriminate and verifiable as long as the entries are notable. If other random people start appearing in here it's worth removing them.
Archrogue (
talk) 19:29, 19 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Lists are not very strictly controlled. As long as a list is well-defined enough to prevent it from being
WP:INDISCRIMINATE, we keep it. Per
SALAT, a list that is likely to have too many entries could be split with narrower criteria instead of deleting. Plus we are always looking for ways to have index articles/lists to better integrate the encyclopedia. Ever since I found
List of Nepalese people whose apparent purpose is to keep obscure Nepali biographies from being orphaned, my bar is pretty low. Usedtobecool☎️ 13:08, 21 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.