From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unopposed.  Sandstein  13:23, 13 August 2016 (UTC) reply

List of This Morning presenters and reporters

List of This Morning presenters and reporters (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I suggest this article 'be merged into This Morning (TV programme)#Presenters because this article is already in prose form there. The only people who edit this page are the I.P.s and they seem to not be able to abide by Wikipedia's guidelines. There is no sense in having this article when it's already in a different style format at the parent article. Corkythe hornetfan 08:13, 21 July 2016 (UTC) reply

If done, there it probably be protected so that the IPs can't recreate it/revert the merge. Corkythe hornetfan 08:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 19:49, 23 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 04:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yellow Dingo  (talk) 06:49, 29 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 02:36, 31 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC) reply
@ Noyster: I've tried merging before, but it doesn't work. This is why I nominated if for deletion. All of what is in this article is in prose form in the other article. It's either delete (which is what I'd like to see happen), or protect the page from I.P.s... Corkythe hornetfan (ping me) 04:53, 10 August 2016 (UTC) reply
I hadn't checked page history, but nor did the nomination make the position clear. The redirection was announced on the article talk page and no-one stepped up to object or discuss, they just kept on reverting the redirect - so support delete : Noyster (talk), 09:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.