The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
BigDom 19:06, 2 April 2011 (UTC)reply
It doesn't have enough sourcing. Of course some of it is sourced, but still.
This seems more like something that would be a category due to its wide inclusion criteria (hence why this is so long). Given the fact that among other things, it will ultimately and redundantly list every Android phone model on Earth (since they all technically meet the inclusion criteria).
The idea of listing all products that run on a certain class of operating systems is unwieldy, in comparison to a better idea; making articles dealing with and providing encyclopedic information about these topics, like say
Linux on mobile devices or
Linux on embedded systems, or even
Linux on desktop computers.
And one more thing, this is also the same reason why we don't have
List of Windows-powered devices, cause that would get insane.
Delete. I think this fits into criteria for a list that is too broad or general
WP:SALAT. Further, I don't believe that the list would provide any encyclopedic value even if categories and subcategories were added to the page. The list doesn't seem to have an informational purpose.
Lord Arador (
talk) 00:28, 27 March 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete - Per nominator.
Rilak (
talk) 22:37, 27 March 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete - I don't think this article violates policy directly, but Linux has become sufficiently pervasive to cease being a distinguishing factor. Three hundred million years ago (more or less),
List of animals that breathe air might have been a good article, but not now.
Matchups 03:23, 29 March 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete unmanageable and indiscriminate list.
OSbornarfcontribs. 16:14, 29 March 2011 (UTC)reply
Keep and split up into the smaller, more manageable lists such as those suggested in point three above. The content is easily referenced, but it's way too broad a topic for one list. So basically it would turn the article into a "list of lists" as described in
WP:SALAT, but the content would be subdivided into less free-wheeling topics.
Steven Walling 02:20, 30 March 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.