The result was no consensus to delete. I am not seeing any deletion argument that is soundly based in policy. The nominator suggests "Problematic article that should be deleted and broken up into its component parts". This presents licensing issues as described at WP:MAD. "Delete with mergers or the creation of new lists as warranted" as proposed by User:Crazypaco has the same problem. I am persuaded by User:Milowent who says this is "an organizational dispute about where to include the various president lists" and this is effectively endorsed by User:DGG. The way forward is to take the discussion to the talk page to decide what to do with the content. After appropriate merging the existing page can be converted to a disambiguation page or parked as a sub-page somewhere to safeguard the attribution history, again as talk page consensus decrees. TerriersFan ( talk) 21:30, 10 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Problematic article that should be deleted and broken up into its component parts. First, there's nothing significant about being an "Ivy League president" that is distinct from being President of X University. Second, the Ivy League is a sports conference. Third, the Ivy League didn't exist until 1954, why are there president dating back to the 17th century? GrapedApe ( talk) 02:03, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply