The result was keep. The deletion argument was that the list was unnecessary and unsuited to Wikipedia. The keepers argued that the list was organised, not indiscriminate and served a useful purpose as an alternative to many stub articles. There was a clear consensus that the page should be kept and, further, in my judgement the keepers had the better of the debate. Finally, there were no overriding policy arguments that would indicate deletion against the consensus. There are deficiencies with the page but these are editorial matters so I am tagging the article for improvements. (Non-admin closure) BlueValour ( talk) 01:06, 27 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:FICT, WP:PLOT, and WP:NOT. Wikipedia is not the Complete Guide to InuYasha. Terms are already given similarly brief definitions when first mentions and in the relevant articles. Such a list is completely unnecessary. Collectonian ( talk) 02:04, 21 April 2008 (UTC) reply