The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Largely unsourced
video game trivia. Lacks
significant coverage from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Everything that needs to be said on this topic can be adequately covered in the appropriate sections of
the series and individual game articles, but I frankly don't see anything sourced and worth merging. czar 22:52, 8 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - The article does not establish notability. The main articles can easily handle core characters in either summary style or very brief lists without causing any size issues.
TTN (
talk) 23:35, 8 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete: This would be too much for an international best seller video game. No independent sources have been proffered, and I doubt any exist. Nha TrangAllons! 15:10, 9 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Redirect: As much I disagree with all the merging of character list articles lately, I'm not seeing quite enough coverage to have this one as its own article, as I've found barely anything in Google searches. However, this should be redirected, not deleted. Deletion should be a last resort, per
WP:CHEAP and
WP:ATD-R, as well as to preserve the content for any future potential the article may have. The character section at F.E.A.R. works as a target.
Kokoro20 (
talk) 22:32, 9 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete, does not meet
WP:GNG. Characters in a notable franchise doesn't make the characters automatically notable.
soetermans.
↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 07:58, 12 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.