The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
WP:NOTTVGUIDE applies here. Just another case of
WP:INDISCRIMINATEWP:LISTCRUFT to appeal to nobody but the small minority of the most ardent fans; another excessively bloated list fit for Fandom but is it encyclopaedic for here? The subjects are not described as a group, failing
WP:LISTN. Additionally
WP:NOTDATABASE and
WP:ROUTINE. As with sources per
WP:RS, fourteen of those are wiki pages, and the rest, if not unsourced, is
WP:PRIMARY.
SpacedFarmer (
talk) 17:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete: the sources provided above fall under
WP:ROUTINE and are not effective to complete
WP:LISTN. This is a trivial list and does not withstand the
WP:SIGCOV to remain as an article. Sources above are a mix of
WP:ROUTINE or not applicable to the article. They are good to add to the main article.
Conyo14 (
talk) 04:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 22:35, 18 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete, as per the reasons given by the original nominator and other delete voter above.
Gottagotospace (
talk) 22:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete I also agree with the nominators reasoning.
Hkkingg (
talk) 23:50, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.