From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 00:41, 4 January 2016 (UTC) reply

List of Bahranis

List of Bahranis (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

empty of content. Rathfelder ( talk) 15:16, 28 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Speedy delete Curro2 ( talk) 15:18, 28 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 16:33, 28 December 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 16:33, 28 December 2015 (UTC) reply
I was not aware of this article's history when I submitted my previous vote. I will therefore withdraw my previous vote. -- Notecardforfree ( talk) 22:17, 28 December 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: I have reverted the article to the version identified by User:Postdlf, which is a fairly clearly valid list article even if it could do with some further clarification of its criteria for inclusion - I would suggest that these should be natives, nationals and inhabitants of Bahrain as it was defined in their lifetimes (since the late 18th century, this would be the state ruled by the House of Khalifa, but before that it would cover eastern Arabia from Kuwait through to northern Oman). A quick look indicates that this would include a clear majority, though not all, of the names on the restored list. We should probably have a separate list of people using Bahrani as a surname, which would include a substantial proportion of the entries not fulfilling the criteria I am suggesting. PWilkinson ( talk) 22:45, 1 January 2016 (UTC) reply
I have no objection to the article if it is possible to reach agreement about the content Rathfelder ( talk) 10:46, 2 January 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.